Unusual patterns
735 counties where the FY2025 grant numbers stand out. A flag means a place is worth a closer look. It is not evidence of fraud, waste or misuse; most flags have ordinary explanations, such as a state agency, university or hospital based in the county, or a one-time project.
What each flag means
- One recipient dominates One organization other than a state agency received at least 80% of a county's grants, in counties with $10M or more.
- High per person Grants per person are at least 5× the typical county of similar population, in counties with $5M or more. Counties are grouped into ten population bands. State agencies are left out of this test because they pass most of their money on to the rest of the state.
- Big increase Grants at least doubled since FY2024, to $5M or more.
- Big drop Grants fell by half or more from at least $5M in FY2024.
735 counties, largest first. Seats of state government are listed last because state offices likely explain their numbers.
| County | State | Grants | Pattern |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York | New York | $13.2B | High per person 21.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $290), not counting state agencies based here. |
| San Francisco | California | $4.4B | High per person Big increase 8.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $290), not counting state agencies based here. Up 103% since FY2024. |
| Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | $3.5B | High per person 6.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $290), not counting state agencies based here. |
| King | Washington | $3.4B | High per person 5.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $290), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Hennepin | Minnesota | $2.4B | High per person 5.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $290), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Washtenaw | Michigan | $2.1B | High per person 19.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $290), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Maui | Hawaii | $1.7B | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 97% of the money: COUNTY OF MAUI. 52.6× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $196), not counting state agencies based here. Up 2,479% since FY2024. |
| Montgomery | Maryland | $1.7B | High per person Big drop 5.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $290), not counting state agencies based here. Down 81% since FY2024. |
| Essex | New Jersey | $1.6B | High per person 6.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $290), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Oakland | Michigan | $1.5B | Big increase Up 1,204% since FY2024. |
| Durham | North Carolina | $1.3B | High per person 14.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $290), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Anchorage | Alaska | $1.3B | High per person 7.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $290), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Pinellas | Florida | $1.3B | Big increase Up 646% since FY2024. |
| Story | Iowa | $1.2B | High per person 11.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $152), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Hillsborough | Florida | $1.1B | Big increase Up 103% since FY2024. |
| Orleans | Louisiana | $1.1B | High per person 7.8× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $290), not counting state agencies based here. |
| St. Louis | Missouri | $1.0B | Big increase Up 351% since FY2024. |
| Arlington | Virginia | $933.3M | High per person 12.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $290), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Adams | Colorado | $919.7M | High per person 6.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $290), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Boulder | Colorado | $817.2M | High per person 8.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $290), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Larimer | Colorado | $692.5M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 84% of the money: COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY. 6.6× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $290), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Orange | North Carolina | $649.1M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 93% of the money: UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL. 22.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $196), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Pasco | Florida | $630.5M | One recipient dominates Big increase One recipient got 94% of the money: PASCO COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. Up 1,055% since FY2024. |
| Yolo | California | $600.2M | High per person 13.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $196), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Callaway | Missouri | $596.6M | Big increase Up 1,963% since FY2024. |
| Butler | Ohio | $595.0M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 92% of the money: CLEVELAND-CLIFFS STEEL CORPORATION. 5.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $290), not counting state agencies based here. Up 635% since FY2024. |
| Alachua | Florida | $591.0M | High per person 7.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $290), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Lexington | South Carolina | $585.1M | High per person Big increase 5.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $290), not counting state agencies based here. Up 231% since FY2024. |
| Norfolk | Virginia | $519.3M | Big increase Up 204% since FY2024. |
| Spokane | Washington | $507.1M | Big increase Up 169% since FY2024. |
| Clark | Kentucky | $498.1M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 99% of the money: EAST KENTUCKY POWER COOPERATIVE, INC. 90.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. Up 14,656% since FY2024. |
| Cochise | Arizona | $471.0M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 92% of the money: ARIZONA ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC. 19.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $196), not counting state agencies based here. Up 1,342% since FY2024. |
| Sullivan | Tennessee | $468.0M | High per person Big increase 15.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $196), not counting state agencies based here. Up 609% since FY2024. |
| Olmsted | Minnesota | $458.5M | High per person 14.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $196), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Montgomery | Virginia | $428.2M | High per person 21.8× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $196), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Charlottesville | Virginia | $416.2M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 88% of the money: RECTOR & VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA. 72.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Pierce | Washington | $413.2M | Big drop Down 60% since FY2024. |
| St. Louis | Missouri | $400.1M | Big drop Down 72% since FY2024. |
| Champaign | Illinois | $395.8M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 88% of the money: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS. 9.8× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $196), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Grand Forks | North Dakota | $375.7M | High per person Big increase 33.8× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $152), not counting state agencies based here. Up 217% since FY2024. |
| Tompkins | New York | $358.7M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 87% of the money: CORNELL UNIVERSITY. 17.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $196), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Monroe | Indiana | $326.8M | High per person Big drop 11.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $196), not counting state agencies based here. Down 62% since FY2024. |
| Apache | Arizona | $324.6M | High per person 32.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $152), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Centre | Pennsylvania | $319.6M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 95% of the money: THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY. 10.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $196), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Tippecanoe | Indiana | $314.1M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 84% of the money: PURDUE UNIVERSITY. 8.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $196), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Fairbanks North Star | Alaska | $305.4M | High per person 21.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $152), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Buncombe | North Carolina | $297.3M | One recipient dominates Big increase One recipient got 80% of the money: ASHEVILLE, CITY OF. Up 470% since FY2024. |
| Worcester | Massachusetts | $271.3M | One recipient dominates One recipient got 83% of the money: UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL. |
| Sarasota | Florida | $269.2M | One recipient dominates One recipient got 83% of the money: SARASOTA, COUNTY OF. |
| Cobb | Georgia | $264.0M | Big increase Up 171% since FY2024. |
| Coconino | Arizona | $246.8M | High per person 8.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $196), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Chittenden | Vermont | $237.9M | High per person 5.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $196), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Johnson | Iowa | $236.7M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 94% of the money: THE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA. 7.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $196), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Douglas | Colorado | $232.1M | One recipient dominates Big increase One recipient got 97% of the money: CORE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE. Up 243% since FY2024. |
| Williamsburg | Virginia | $230.9M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 87% of the money: TRUST FUND FOR THE PEOPLE OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS. 139.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. Up 121% since FY2024. |
| Cherokee | Oklahoma | $223.5M | High per person 38.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Lee | Florida | $220.6M | Big drop Down 82% since FY2024. |
| Clarke | Georgia | $220.1M | High per person 8.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $196), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Humboldt | California | $216.5M | High per person 8.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $196), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Lee | Virginia | $213.7M | High per person Big increase 5.6× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. Up 1,058% since FY2024. |
| Grafton | New Hampshire | $209.6M | High per person 15.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $152), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Platte | Nebraska | $203.8M | Big increase Up 3,288% since FY2024. |
| Midland | Michigan | $199.5M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 98% of the money: DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, THE. 15.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $152), not counting state agencies based here. Up 5,594% since FY2024. |
| Atascosa | Texas | $195.6M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 97% of the money: SAN MIGUEL ELECTRIC COOP. 32.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. Up 2,769% since FY2024. |
| Boone | Missouri | $194.8M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 84% of the money: UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI SYSTEM. 5.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $196), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Benton | Oregon | $191.4M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 87% of the money: OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY. 13.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $152), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Anoka | Minnesota | $186.3M | One recipient dominates Big increase One recipient got 91% of the money: CONNEXUS ENERGY. Up 1,291% since FY2024. |
| Houghton | Michigan | $167.3M | High per person Big increase 30.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. Up 112% since FY2024. |
| Pickens | South Carolina | $163.4M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 94% of the money: CLEMSON UNIVERSITY. 6.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $196), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Nueces | Texas | $162.2M | Big increase Up 237% since FY2024. |
| Arapahoe | Colorado | $159.4M | Big drop Down 79% since FY2024. |
| Skagit | Washington | $151.8M | High per person 6.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $196), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Okmulgee | Oklahoma | $151.0M | High per person 27.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Ascension | Louisiana | $147.4M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 84% of the money: HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. 5.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $196), not counting state agencies based here. Up 369% since FY2024. |
| Washington | Rhode Island | $145.9M | High per person 5.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $196), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Linn | Iowa | $138.7M | Big increase Up 123% since FY2024. |
| Union | Arkansas | $137.5M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 91% of the money: SWA LITHIUM LLC. 28.6× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. Up 1,122% since FY2024. |
| Gallatin | Montana | $136.7M | High per person 5.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $196), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Douglas | Kansas | $135.9M | High per person 5.8× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $196), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Navajo | Arizona | $135.5M | High per person 6.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $196), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Missoula | Montana | $132.8M | High per person 5.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $196), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Livingston | Louisiana | $131.9M | One recipient dominates Big increase One recipient got 93% of the money: ELEMENT 25 LOUISIANA LLC. New money: almost none in FY2024. |
| Monongalia | West Virginia | $130.8M | High per person 6.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $196), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Clackamas | Oregon | $129.2M | Big increase Up 152% since FY2024. |
| Elko | Nevada | $126.7M | High per person Big increase 19.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. Up 323% since FY2024. |
| Pontotoc | Oklahoma | $124.9M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 88% of the money: CHICKASAW NATION. 22.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Benton | Washington | $123.2M | Big increase Up 178% since FY2024. |
| Cibola | New Mexico | $122.3M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 84% of the money: PUEBLO OF ACOMA. 29.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. Up 385% since FY2024. |
| Nome | Alaska | $120.7M | High per person 95.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Clallam | Washington | $120.6M | High per person 10.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $152), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Northwest Arctic | Alaska | $117.8M | High per person Big increase 90.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. Up 194% since FY2024. |
| Hancock | Maine | $116.9M | High per person 17.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Bethel | Alaska | $116.8M | High per person 58.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Lee | Alabama | $116.2M | One recipient dominates One recipient got 91% of the money: AUBURN UNIVERSITY. |
| Hamilton | Tennessee | $116.2M | Big drop Down 61% since FY2024. |
| Bryan | Oklahoma | $116.2M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 81% of the money: CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA. 20.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Kenai Peninsula | Alaska | $111.8M | High per person 12.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $152), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Jefferson | Texas | $111.2M | Big increase Up 256% since FY2024. |
| Chippewa | Michigan | $111.1M | High per person 20.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Newport | Rhode Island | $109.3M | Big increase Up 126% since FY2024. |
| Cayuga | New York | $109.0M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 85% of the money: CAYUGA HOME FOR CHILDREN. 9.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $152), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Porter | Indiana | $108.5M | Big increase Up 301% since FY2024. |
| Nez Perce | Idaho | $105.5M | High per person 18.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Staunton | Virginia | $105.5M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 98% of the money: VSDB FOUNDATION. 37.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Whitman | Washington | $105.3M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 93% of the money: WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY. 17.8× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Oktibbeha | Mississippi | $105.2M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 92% of the money: MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY. 16.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. |
| McKinley | New Mexico | $103.5M | High per person 9.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $152), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Grand | Colorado | $102.7M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 98% of the money: MOUNTAIN PARKS ELECTRIC, INC. 60.8× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. Up 20,164% since FY2024. |
| Riley | Kansas | $101.1M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 90% of the money: KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY. 8.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $152), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Oglala Lakota | South Dakota | $94.9M | High per person 55.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Douglas | Nevada | $94.6M | High per person 12.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Waukesha | Wisconsin | $94.1M | Big drop Down 58% since FY2024. |
| Fremont | Wyoming | $90.1M | High per person 18.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Hill | Montana | $88.5M | High per person 30.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Grays Harbor | Washington | $82.3M | High per person 7.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $152), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Todd | South Dakota | $80.5M | High per person 68.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Williamson | Texas | $80.2M | Big increase Up 129% since FY2024. |
| Washington | Mississippi | $78.8M | High per person 14.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Jackson | West Virginia | $78.5M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 90% of the money: CONSTELLIUM ROLLED PRODUCTS RAVENSWOOD, LLC. 19.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. Up 659% since FY2024. |
| Taos | New Mexico | $78.1M | High per person Big increase 15.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. Up 110% since FY2024. |
| Lake | Montana | $75.3M | High per person 16.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Okanogan | Washington | $75.2M | High per person 14.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Onslow | North Carolina | $75.1M | Big increase Up 177% since FY2024. |
| La Plata | Colorado | $74.5M | High per person 10.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Del Norte | California | $74.0M | High per person 17.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Cattaraugus | New York | $72.6M | High per person 6.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $152), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Silver Bow | Montana | $72.0M | High per person Big increase 13.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. Up 121% since FY2024. |
| Latah | Idaho | $71.8M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 90% of the money: REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO. 14.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Texas | Oklahoma | $70.8M | High per person Big increase 30.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. Up 3,301% since FY2024. |
| Rolette | North Dakota | $69.7M | High per person 45.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Glacier | Montana | $69.3M | High per person 39.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Sioux | North Dakota | $69.0M | High per person 116.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Gila | Arizona | $68.6M | High per person 10.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Island | Washington | $68.5M | One recipient dominates High per person Big drop One recipient got 84% of the money: SCHOOL DIST #201 ISLAND COUNTY. 5.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $152), not counting state agencies based here. Down 60% since FY2024. |
| Albany | Wyoming | $68.3M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 88% of the money: UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING. 12.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Thurston | Nebraska | $66.9M | High per person 57.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Rankin | Mississippi | $66.7M | Big drop Down 66% since FY2024. |
| Klamath | Oregon | $66.6M | High per person 5.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $152), not counting state agencies based here. |
| La Crosse | Wisconsin | $66.6M | Big drop Down 85% since FY2024. |
| Wood | Ohio | $66.0M | One recipient dominates Big increase One recipient got 87% of the money: OWENS-BROCKWAY GLASS CONTAINER INC. Up 286% since FY2024. |
| Indiana | Pennsylvania | $65.9M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 85% of the money: NATIONAL CENTER FOR DEFENSE MANUFACTURING AND MACHINING. 5.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $152), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Beltrami | Minnesota | $65.8M | High per person 10.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Monroe | Florida | $63.6M | High per person 5.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $152), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Howard | Maryland | $63.4M | Big drop Down 97% since FY2024. |
| Ottawa | Oklahoma | $62.8M | High per person 14.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Lafayette | Mississippi | $62.3M | High per person 6.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Blaine | Montana | $61.2M | High per person Big increase 51.8× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. Up 109% since FY2024. |
| Inyo | California | $59.3M | High per person 27.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Sheboygan | Wisconsin | $59.1M | One recipient dominates Big increase One recipient got 87% of the money: KOHLER CO. Up 487% since FY2024. |
| Lake | California | $58.9M | High per person 5.6× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $152), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Washington | Maine | $58.1M | High per person 12.6× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Aroostook | Maine | $57.0M | High per person Big drop 5.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $152), not counting state agencies based here. Down 52% since FY2024. |
| Prince of Wales-Hyder | Alaska | $57.0M | High per person 59.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Routt | Colorado | $56.8M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 87% of the money: YAMPA VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOC. 20.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. Up 168% since FY2024. |
| Big Horn | Montana | $56.0M | High per person 33.8× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Waller | Texas | $55.5M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 100% of the money: PRAIRIE VIEW A&M UNIVERSITY. 6.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $152), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Jackson | Oklahoma | $54.9M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 92% of the money: ALTUS PUBLIC SCHOOLS. 20.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. Up 345% since FY2024. |
| Cass | Minnesota | $54.8M | High per person 12.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Platte | Missouri | $54.3M | One recipient dominates Big increase One recipient got 104% of the money: KANSAS CITY DOWNTOWN AIRPORT - WHEELER FIELD. Up 147% since FY2024. |
| Crawford | Michigan | $53.7M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 96% of the money: GRAYLING TOWNSHIP. 32.8× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. Up 3,116% since FY2024. |
| Yellowstone | Montana | $53.7M | Big drop Down 52% since FY2024. |
| Jackson | Michigan | $53.6M | Big drop Down 58% since FY2024. |
| Letcher | Kentucky | $51.8M | High per person 21.8× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Marshall | Mississippi | $51.7M | High per person 10.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. |
| La Paz | Arizona | $51.3M | High per person Big increase 28.8× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. Up 159% since FY2024. |
| Caddo | Oklahoma | $50.6M | High per person 12.6× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Floyd | Kentucky | $50.4M | High per person 9.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Osage | Oklahoma | $49.9M | High per person 8.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Stephens | Oklahoma | $48.9M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 90% of the money: NATIONAL RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION. 9.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Montgomery | Pennsylvania | $47.6M | Big drop Down 55% since FY2024. |
| Rio Arriba | New Mexico | $47.5M | High per person 9.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Dawson | Georgia | $46.8M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 97% of the money: ETOWAH WATER & SEWER AUTHORITY. 15.8× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. Up 115% since FY2024. |
| Aleutians West | Alaska | $46.3M | High per person 58.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Alpena | Michigan | $46.0M | High per person 10.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Perry | Kentucky | $45.2M | High per person 8.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Garfield | Colorado | $45.1M | Big drop Down 61% since FY2024. |
| North Slope | Alaska | $44.6M | High per person 31.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Loudoun | Virginia | $43.4M | Big drop Down 54% since FY2024. |
| Brazoria | Texas | $43.2M | Big increase Up 260% since FY2024. |
| Brookings | South Dakota | $42.6M | One recipient dominates High per person Big drop One recipient got 95% of the money: SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY. 8.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. Down 66% since FY2024. |
| Macon | Alabama | $42.3M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 83% of the money: TUSKEGEE UNIVERSITY. 20.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Hancock | Iowa | $41.1M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 97% of the money: GREENFIELD NITROGEN, LLC. 30.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. Up 1,593% since FY2024. |
| Dallam | Texas | $40.9M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 100% of the money: RITA BLANCA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. 34.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. New money: almost none in FY2024. |
| Pulaski | Missouri | $40.4M | High per person 6.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Daniels | Montana | $40.3M | High per person Big increase 159.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. New money: almost none in FY2024. |
| Benson | North Dakota | $39.8M | High per person 39.8× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| St. Lucie | Florida | $39.8M | Big drop Down 80% since FY2024. |
| Swain | North Carolina | $39.7M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 89% of the money: EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS. 26.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Plaquemines | Louisiana | $39.7M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 97% of the money: BELLE CHASSE ACADEMY, INC. 15.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. Up 358% since FY2024. |
| Oneida | New York | $39.4M | Big drop Down 57% since FY2024. |
| Fort Bend | Texas | $39.4M | Big drop Down 80% since FY2024. |
| Petersburg | Virginia | $39.3M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 85% of the money: VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY. 7.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. |
| St. Mary | Louisiana | $38.2M | High per person 6.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Jasper | Missouri | $38.1M | Big drop Down 56% since FY2024. |
| Wasco | Oregon | $37.8M | High per person 8.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Aiken | South Carolina | $37.8M | Big increase Up 162% since FY2024. |
| Terrebonne | Louisiana | $37.6M | Big drop Down 58% since FY2024. |
| Escambia | Alabama | $37.3M | High per person 6.8× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Sandusky | Ohio | $37.1M | One recipient dominates One recipient got 84% of the money: GREAT LAKES COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP. |
| Hughes | Oklahoma | $37.1M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 82% of the money: SEMINOLE NATION OF OKLAHOMA, THE. 22.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. Up 354% since FY2024. |
| Lincoln | Louisiana | $37.1M | High per person 6.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Dillingham | Alaska | $36.5M | High per person 49.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Chilton | Alabama | $36.4M | Big drop Down 55% since FY2024. |
| Dewey | South Dakota | $36.3M | High per person 45.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Fayette | Tennessee | $36.2M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 98% of the money: CHICKASAW ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE. 7.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. Up 292% since FY2024. |
| Ford | Kansas | $35.4M | High per person 5.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Menominee | Wisconsin | $35.0M | High per person 53.8× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Columbia | Georgia | $34.9M | One recipient dominates Big increase One recipient got 97% of the money: COLUMBIA, COUNTY OF. Up 2,066% since FY2024. |
| Becker | Minnesota | $34.8M | High per person 6.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Lake | Florida | $33.9M | Big increase Up 212% since FY2024. |
| Wood | West Virginia | $33.9M | Big increase Up 106% since FY2024. |
| Jefferson | Oregon | $33.7M | High per person Big drop 11.8× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. Down 88% since FY2024. |
| Windham | Vermont | $33.6M | High per person 5.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Delaware | New York | $33.2M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 83% of the money: DELAWARE COUNTY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC. 6.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. Up 294% since FY2024. |
| Franklin | New York | $32.9M | High per person 5.6× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Otter Tail | Minnesota | $32.9M | Big increase Up 188% since FY2024. |
| Ashland | Wisconsin | $32.5M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 86% of the money: BAD RIVER BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS. 18.8× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. Up 114% since FY2024. |
| Rosebud | Montana | $32.5M | High per person 23.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Lincoln | Oklahoma | $32.0M | High per person 6.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Hall | Georgia | $31.9M | One recipient dominates One recipient got 87% of the money: NINTH DISTRICT OPPORTUNITY, INC. |
| Roberts | South Dakota | $31.3M | High per person 23.8× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Yukon-Koyukuk | Alaska | $31.1M | High per person 38.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Peach | Georgia | $30.7M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 97% of the money: FORT VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY. 7.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Davis | Utah | $29.5M | Big drop Down 51% since FY2024. |
| Kusilvak | Alaska | $29.3M | High per person 20.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Choctaw | Oklahoma | $29.0M | High per person 18.8× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Somerset | Maryland | $28.9M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 85% of the money: UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND ES. 10.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Seminole | Oklahoma | $28.4M | High per person 10.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Claiborne | Mississippi | $28.2M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 92% of the money: ALCORN STATE UNIVERSITY. 18.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Teton | Wyoming | $27.9M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 88% of the money: JACKSON HOLE AIRPORT BOARD. 10.8× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Dukes | Massachusetts | $27.8M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 83% of the money: COUNTYOFDUKESCOUNTY. 12.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. Up 202% since FY2024. |
| Vilas | Wisconsin | $27.6M | High per person 10.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Colquitt | Georgia | $27.5M | One recipient dominates One recipient got 84% of the money: SOUTHWEST GEORGIA COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL, INC. |
| Dallas | Alabama | $27.2M | High per person 5.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Marion | Mississippi | $27.1M | High per person Big increase 10.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. Up 182% since FY2024. |
| Siskiyou | California | $27.1M | Big drop Down 51% since FY2024. |
| Allen | Louisiana | $26.8M | High per person 10.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Bolivar | Mississippi | $26.7M | High per person 5.6× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Scott | Iowa | $26.7M | Big increase Up 150% since FY2024. |
| Baraga | Michigan | $26.6M | High per person 19.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Knox | Kentucky | $26.5M | High per person 5.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Ohio | West Virginia | $26.4M | High per person 5.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. |
| East Feliciana | Louisiana | $26.4M | High per person 12.6× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Putnam | West Virginia | $26.4M | Big increase Up 260% since FY2024. |
| Kodiak Island | Alaska | $26.3M | High per person 15.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Polk | Minnesota | $25.9M | High per person 5.6× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Richland | Montana | $25.6M | High per person 17.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Pawnee | Oklahoma | $25.4M | High per person 15.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Boyd | Kentucky | $25.4M | Big increase Up 100% since FY2024. |
| Charles Mix | South Dakota | $25.4M | High per person 21.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Chautauqua | New York | $25.2M | Big drop Down 54% since FY2024. |
| Sawyer | Wisconsin | $24.9M | High per person 6.6× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Randolph | North Carolina | $24.6M | Big increase Up 160% since FY2024. |
| Thomas | Georgia | $24.6M | One recipient dominates Big increase One recipient got 81% of the money: CITY OF THOMASVILLE. Up 157% since FY2024. |
| Curry | New Mexico | $24.0M | Big drop Down 57% since FY2024. |
| Moody | South Dakota | $24.0M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 90% of the money: FLANDREAU SANTEE SIOUX TRIBE. 22.6× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. Up 516% since FY2024. |
| Johnson | Kentucky | $23.7M | High per person 9.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Roosevelt | Montana | $23.6M | High per person 17.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Ketchikan Gateway | Alaska | $23.6M | High per person 13.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Forest | Wisconsin | $23.6M | High per person 14.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Osceola | Florida | $23.3M | Big drop Down 56% since FY2024. |
| Jim Wells | Texas | $23.3M | One recipient dominates One recipient got 92% of the money: COMMUNITY ACTION CORPORATION OF SOUTH TEXAS. |
| Sheridan | Wyoming | $23.3M | High per person Big increase 5.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. Up 391% since FY2024. |
| McLennan | Texas | $23.3M | One recipient dominates Big drop One recipient got 81% of the money: MISSION WACO MISSION WORLD. Down 71% since FY2024. |
| San Juan | Washington | $23.1M | High per person Big increase 12.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. Up 142% since FY2024. |
| Ellis | Kansas | $23.1M | High per person Big drop 5.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. Down 79% since FY2024. |
| Benewah | Idaho | $23.0M | High per person 19.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| McCurtain | Oklahoma | $22.8M | One recipient dominates Big increase One recipient got 84% of the money: THE BROKEN BOW PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY. Up 320% since FY2024. |
| Haskell | Oklahoma | $22.7M | High per person 15.6× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Logan | Oklahoma | $22.6M | One recipient dominates One recipient got 90% of the money: LANGSTON UNIVERSITY. |
| Bayfield | Wisconsin | $22.6M | High per person 6.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Charles | Maryland | $22.5M | Big drop Down 69% since FY2024. |
| Lake | Ohio | $22.5M | Big drop Down 63% since FY2024. |
| Hockley | Texas | $22.5M | High per person 9.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Madison | New York | $22.3M | One recipient dominates One recipient got 84% of the money: ONEIDA INDIAN NATION. |
| Shelby | Kentucky | $22.2M | One recipient dominates One recipient got 98% of the money: OHIO VALLEY EDUCATIONAL COOPERATIVE. |
| Webb | Texas | $22.2M | Big drop Down 75% since FY2024. |
| Medina | Ohio | $22.2M | Big increase Up 381% since FY2024. |
| Torrance | New Mexico | $22.1M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 100% of the money: CENTRAL NM ELECTRIC CO-OPERATIVE INC. 13.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. New money: almost none in FY2024. |
| Lincoln | South Dakota | $22.1M | One recipient dominates Big drop One recipient got 95% of the money: LEWIS & CLARK REGIONAL WATER SYSTEM. Down 77% since FY2024. |
| Cleveland | North Carolina | $22.0M | Big increase Up 162% since FY2024. |
| San Juan | Utah | $21.8M | High per person 14.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Chaves | New Mexico | $21.8M | Big increase Up 108% since FY2024. |
| Clay | South Dakota | $21.8M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 88% of the money: THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA. 13.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Custer | South Dakota | $21.6M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 95% of the money: BLACK HILLS ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. 15.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. Up 2,882% since FY2024. |
| Webster | Iowa | $21.6M | Big increase Up 134% since FY2024. |
| Leavenworth | Kansas | $21.3M | One recipient dominates One recipient got 88% of the money: FORT LEAVENWORTH USD #207. |
| Knox | Nebraska | $21.2M | High per person 15.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Coahoma | Mississippi | $21.2M | High per person 9.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Perry | Indiana | $20.8M | High per person Big increase 10.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. Up 183% since FY2024. |
| Toole | Montana | $20.6M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 94% of the money: WELL DONE NEW MEXICO LLC. 27.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. Up 1,661% since FY2024. |
| Mingo | West Virginia | $20.6M | High per person 7.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. |
| McKenzie | North Dakota | $20.5M | High per person Big drop 13.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. Down 86% since FY2024. |
| Gogebic | Michigan | $20.5M | High per person Big increase 12.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. Up 111% since FY2024. |
| Knott | Kentucky | $20.5M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 85% of the money: KNOTT COUNTY FISCAL COURT. 13.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Catahoula | Louisiana | $20.4M | High per person Big increase 13.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. Up 132% since FY2024. |
| Marion | Alabama | $20.3M | Big increase Up 143% since FY2024. |
| Lincoln | New Mexico | $20.2M | High per person Big drop 9.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. Down 62% since FY2024. |
| Leelanau | Michigan | $20.0M | High per person 8.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Woodford | Kentucky | $20.0M | Big increase Up 120% since FY2024. |
| Livingston | New York | $19.9M | Big increase Up 183% since FY2024. |
| Halifax | Virginia | $19.8M | One recipient dominates One recipient got 83% of the money: WARD BURTON WILDLIFE FOUNDATION. |
| Doniphan | Kansas | $19.8M | High per person Big increase 15.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. Up 124% since FY2024. |
| Gloucester | New Jersey | $19.3M | One recipient dominates One recipient got 81% of the money: ROWAN UNIVERSITY. |
| Racine | Wisconsin | $19.3M | Big drop Down 55% since FY2024. |
| Alamosa | Colorado | $19.3M | High per person 10.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Trinity | California | $19.2M | High per person Big increase 11.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. Up 135% since FY2024. |
| McCracken | Kentucky | $18.8M | Big drop Down 59% since FY2024. |
| Crook | Oregon | $18.8M | High per person 6.8× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Grand | Utah | $18.7M | High per person Big increase 15.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. Up 431% since FY2024. |
| Pointe Coupee | Louisiana | $18.7M | High per person Big increase 8.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. Up 134% since FY2024. |
| Garvin | Oklahoma | $18.6M | High per person Big increase 6.6× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. Up 107% since FY2024. |
| Hood River | Oregon | $18.6M | High per person 7.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Miami | Ohio | $18.4M | One recipient dominates One recipient got 93% of the money: COUNCIL ON RURAL SERVICE PROGRAMS, INC. |
| Dorchester | Maryland | $18.1M | One recipient dominates One recipient got 94% of the money: UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE. |
| Woodruff | Arkansas | $18.1M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 94% of the money: ARCARE. 17.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Holt | Missouri | $18.1M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 99% of the money: CLEVELAND COUNTY TELEPHONE CO. INC. 28.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. New money: almost none in FY2024. |
| Chowan | North Carolina | $17.8M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 96% of the money: ECONOMIC IMPROVEMENT COUNCIL, INC. 10.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Pasquotank | North Carolina | $17.6M | One recipient dominates One recipient got 89% of the money: ELIZABETH CITY STATE UNIVERSITY. |
| Nicholas | West Virginia | $17.5M | High per person 6.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Henderson | Kentucky | $17.5M | Big increase Up 175% since FY2024. |
| Harney | Oregon | $17.4M | High per person 13.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Wallowa | Oregon | $17.4M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 87% of the money: NORTHEAST OREGON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. 14.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. Up 190% since FY2024. |
| Bourbon | Kentucky | $17.2M | High per person 7.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Montezuma | Colorado | $17.0M | High per person 5.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Fayette | Iowa | $17.0M | High per person Big increase 8.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. Up 1,458% since FY2024. |
| Blaine | Idaho | $16.7M | High per person Big increase 6.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. Up 123% since FY2024. |
| Mineral | West Virginia | $16.6M | Big increase Up 162% since FY2024. |
| Adair | Missouri | $16.5M | High per person 5.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Chatham | North Carolina | $16.4M | One recipient dominates One recipient got 89% of the money: FAMILIES & COMMUNITIES RISING, INC. |
| Hoonah-Angoon | Alaska | $16.3M | High per person 45.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Churchill | Nevada | $16.2M | High per person 5.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Rio Grande | Colorado | $16.1M | High per person 8.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Audrain | Missouri | $16.0M | Big drop Down 60% since FY2024. |
| Bristol Bay | Alaska | $16.0M | Big drop Down 62% since FY2024. |
| Monroe | Michigan | $16.0M | Big drop Down 70% since FY2024. |
| Weakley | Tennessee | $15.8M | One recipient dominates One recipient got 84% of the money: NORTH WEST TENNESSEE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL. |
| Montour | Pennsylvania | $15.8M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 87% of the money: GEISINGER CLINIC. 8.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Mahnomen | Minnesota | $15.4M | High per person 17.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Nash | North Carolina | $15.4M | One recipient dominates Big increase One recipient got 82% of the money: CITY OF ROCKY MOUNT NORTH CAROLINA. Up 210% since FY2024. |
| Bonneville | Idaho | $15.3M | Big drop Down 59% since FY2024. |
| Lincoln | Tennessee | $15.2M | One recipient dominates One recipient got 87% of the money: SOUTH CENTRAL HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY, INC. |
| Brown | Kansas | $15.2M | High per person 12.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Boone | Arkansas | $15.2M | Big increase Up 101% since FY2024. |
| Platte | Wyoming | $15.1M | High per person 10.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Defiance | Ohio | $15.1M | Big increase Up 118% since FY2024. |
| Charles City | Virginia | $15.0M | High per person Big increase 13.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. Up 301% since FY2024. |
| Fulton | Kentucky | $15.0M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 86% of the money: CITY OF FULTON. 13.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. Up 217% since FY2024. |
| Jefferson Davis | Mississippi | $14.7M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 93% of the money: THE FIVE COUNTY CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM, INC. 10.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Wilson | Tennessee | $14.7M | One recipient dominates One recipient got 94% of the money: MID-CUMBERLAND COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY, INC. |
| San Benito | California | $14.6M | Big increase Up 190% since FY2024. |
| Worcester | Maryland | $14.5M | Big increase Up 159% since FY2024. |
| Hettinger | North Dakota | $14.4M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 100% of the money: CITY OF MOTT. 37.8× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Payette | Idaho | $14.3M | High per person 5.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Hampton | South Carolina | $14.0M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 100% of the money: LOWCOUNTRY REGIONAL WATER SYSTEM. 7.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. Up 1,869% since FY2024. |
| Henry | Missouri | $13.9M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 83% of the money: COMPASS HEALTH, INC. 5.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Ionia | Michigan | $13.9M | One recipient dominates One recipient got 89% of the money: EIGHTCAP, INC. |
| Scott | Missouri | $13.8M | One recipient dominates Big drop One recipient got 130% of the money: DELTA AREA ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORPORATION. Down 56% since FY2024. |
| Union | Oregon | $13.7M | Big increase Up 146% since FY2024. |
| Hall | Nebraska | $13.7M | Big drop Down 97% since FY2024. |
| Meade | South Dakota | $13.6M | Big drop Down 62% since FY2024. |
| Bibb | Alabama | $13.6M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 93% of the money: CAHABA MEDICAL CARE FOUNDATION. 5.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Colusa | California | $13.5M | High per person 5.6× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Barron | Wisconsin | $13.3M | Big drop Down 55% since FY2024. |
| Aleutians East | Alaska | $13.2M | High per person 24.6× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Cocke | Tennessee | $13.1M | Big increase Up 107% since FY2024. |
| White Pine | Nevada | $13.0M | High per person 8.6× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Lake and Peninsula | Alaska | $13.0M | High per person 57.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Bulloch | Georgia | $12.8M | One recipient dominates One recipient got 89% of the money: GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY RESEARCH & SERVICE FOUNDATION INC. |
| Sitka | Alaska | $12.8M | High per person 9.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Murray | Oklahoma | $12.3M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 99% of the money: OKLAHOMA VETERANS CENTER. 7.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Lake | South Dakota | $12.2M | High per person 8.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Jackson | Wisconsin | $12.1M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 88% of the money: HO-CHUNK NATION OF WISCONSIN. 5.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Plumas | California | $12.1M | High per person Big drop 5.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $110), not counting state agencies based here. Down 56% since FY2024. |
| Somerset | New Jersey | $12.0M | Big drop Down 65% since FY2024. |
| Hardy | West Virginia | $11.9M | High per person 7.8× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Madison | Georgia | $11.9M | One recipient dominates One recipient got 90% of the money: MEDLINK GEORGIA, INC. |
| St. Martin | Louisiana | $11.9M | One recipient dominates One recipient got 87% of the money: ST MARTIN PARISH SCHOOL BOARD. |
| Ector | Texas | $11.9M | Big drop Down 57% since FY2024. |
| Georgetown | South Carolina | $11.8M | Big increase Up 126% since FY2024. |
| Pike | Ohio | $11.6M | One recipient dominates One recipient got 82% of the money: COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE OF PIKE COUNTY. |
| Mountrail | North Dakota | $11.5M | High per person 9.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Starr | Texas | $11.4M | One recipient dominates One recipient got 82% of the money: UNION WATER SUPPLY. |
| Kemper | Mississippi | $11.4M | High per person 7.6× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Morgan | Kentucky | $11.4M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 98% of the money: GATEWAY COMMUNITY SERVICE ORGANIZATION, INC. 6.6× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Cheshire | New Hampshire | $11.4M | Big drop Down 54% since FY2024. |
| Mercer | Missouri | $11.3M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 98% of the money: GRAND RIVER MUTUAL TELEPHONE CORP. 21.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. Up 1,264% since FY2024. |
| Buckingham | Virginia | $11.2M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 98% of the money: CENTRAL VIRGINIA HEALTH SERVICES, INC. 6.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Jefferson | Ohio | $11.2M | Big increase Up 427% since FY2024. |
| Petersburg | Alaska | $11.1M | High per person 21.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Hyde | North Carolina | $11.0M | One recipient dominates High per person Big drop One recipient got 95% of the money: THE TRUST FOR TOMORROW. 15.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. Down 53% since FY2024. |
| Otero | New Mexico | $10.8M | Big drop Down 72% since FY2024. |
| Grant | New Mexico | $10.8M | Big drop Down 87% since FY2024. |
| Cumberland | Kentucky | $10.8M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 91% of the money: CUMBERLAND FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER, INC. 10.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Brewster | Texas | $10.7M | High per person 8.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Hancock | Mississippi | $10.7M | One recipient dominates Big increase One recipient got 90% of the money: HANCOCK COUNTY PORT & HARBOR COMMISSION. Up 186% since FY2024. |
| White | Arkansas | $10.7M | Big increase Up 110% since FY2024. |
| Marion | South Carolina | $10.6M | Big increase Up 206% since FY2024. |
| Muskogee | Oklahoma | $10.6M | Big drop Down 60% since FY2024. |
| Franklin | Virginia | $10.6M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 93% of the money: THE CHILDREN'S CENTER. 7.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Mille Lacs | Minnesota | $10.5M | One recipient dominates One recipient got 81% of the money: MILLE LACS BAND OF OJIBWE. |
| Unicoi | Tennessee | $10.5M | One recipient dominates High per person Big increase One recipient got 84% of the money: COUNTY OF UNICOI. 5.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. Up 853% since FY2024. |
| Miner | South Dakota | $10.4M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 99% of the money: HORIZON HEALTH CARE, INC. 29.8× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Trempealeau | Wisconsin | $10.4M | One recipient dominates One recipient got 87% of the money: WESTERN DAIRYLAND ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL, INC. |
| Modoc | California | $10.4M | High per person Big increase 7.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. Up 126% since FY2024. |
| Madison | Idaho | $10.4M | Big increase Up 412% since FY2024. |
| Oconee | South Carolina | $10.4M | Big increase Up 140% since FY2024. |
| Benton | Arkansas | $10.3M | Big drop Down 52% since FY2024. |
| Bamberg | South Carolina | $10.1M | High per person Big drop 6.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. Down 56% since FY2024. |
| Rowan | Kentucky | $10.0M | One recipient dominates Big drop One recipient got 84% of the money: MOREHEAD STATE UNIVERSITY. Down 57% since FY2024. |
| Palo Alto | Iowa | $10.0M | High per person 6.6× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Doddridge | West Virginia | $10.0M | One recipient dominates High per person One recipient got 100% of the money: TOWN OF WEST UNION TOWN HALL. 7.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Lewis | Washington | $10.0M | Big drop Down 55% since FY2024. |
| Codington | South Dakota | $9.8M | Big increase Up 112% since FY2024. |
| Kauai | Hawaii | $9.8M | Big drop Down 58% since FY2024. |
| Tuolumne | California | $9.8M | Big drop Down 54% since FY2024. |
| Wright | Missouri | $9.7M | Big drop Down 52% since FY2024. |
| Northampton | North Carolina | $9.6M | High per person 5.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Williamsburg | South Carolina | $9.6M | Big increase Up 886% since FY2024. |
| Cherokee | Texas | $9.6M | Big increase Up 584% since FY2024. |
| Madison | Nebraska | $9.6M | Big drop Down 59% since FY2024. |
| Mora | New Mexico | $9.6M | High per person Big drop 15.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. Down 54% since FY2024. |
| Coleman | Texas | $9.5M | High per person 7.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Jefferson | Nebraska | $9.5M | High per person 7.8× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Phillips | Arkansas | $9.5M | High per person 5.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Waldo | Maine | $9.5M | Big drop Down 55% since FY2024. |
| Eddy | New Mexico | $9.5M | Big drop Down 63% since FY2024. |
| Polk | Arkansas | $9.3M | Big drop Down 62% since FY2024. |
| Delaware | Ohio | $9.3M | Big drop Down 82% since FY2024. |
| Grant | Minnesota | $9.3M | High per person 9.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Stewart | Georgia | $9.2M | High per person 11.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Wilson | Kansas | $9.2M | High per person Big increase 6.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. New money: almost none in FY2024. |
| Stephens | Georgia | $9.1M | Big increase Up 342% since FY2024. |
| Sevier | Utah | $9.1M | Big increase Up 177% since FY2024. |
| Tishomingo | Mississippi | $9.1M | Big increase New money: almost none in FY2024. |
| Mineral | Nevada | $9.1M | High per person 13.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Sierra | New Mexico | $9.1M | Big drop Down 53% since FY2024. |
| Noble | Oklahoma | $9.0M | High per person 6.6× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Adair | Oklahoma | $9.0M | Big drop Down 54% since FY2024. |
| Lee | Kentucky | $9.0M | High per person 7.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Kaufman | Texas | $9.0M | Big increase Up 136% since FY2024. |
| Greenbrier | West Virginia | $8.9M | Big drop Down 75% since FY2024. |
| Bennett | South Dakota | $8.7M | High per person 16.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Grady | Oklahoma | $8.7M | Big increase Up 159% since FY2024. |
| Randolph | Arkansas | $8.6M | Big drop Down 58% since FY2024. |
| Fredericksburg | Virginia | $8.5M | Big drop Down 81% since FY2024. |
| Dimmit | Texas | $8.5M | High per person 5.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Fergus | Montana | $8.5M | High per person Big increase 5.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. Up 324% since FY2024. |
| Klickitat | Washington | $8.5M | Big increase Up 1,131% since FY2024. |
| San Miguel | Colorado | $8.4M | High per person Big increase 6.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. Up 155% since FY2024. |
| Roseau | Minnesota | $8.4M | High per person 5.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Craig | Oklahoma | $8.4M | High per person 5.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $107), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Sherman | Nebraska | $8.3M | High per person 18.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Seneca | New York | $8.2M | Big increase Up 279% since FY2024. |
| Bottineau | North Dakota | $8.2M | High per person 7.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Lyman | South Dakota | $8.0M | High per person 14.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Johnston | Oklahoma | $8.0M | High per person 6.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Fillmore | Minnesota | $8.0M | Big drop Down 62% since FY2024. |
| Monroe | Arkansas | $7.9M | High per person 6.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Chippewa | Minnesota | $7.9M | Big increase Up 223% since FY2024. |
| Martin | Kentucky | $7.9M | High per person Big increase 5.6× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. Up 414% since FY2024. |
| Sampson | North Carolina | $7.9M | Big increase Up 429% since FY2024. |
| Cotton | Oklahoma | $7.8M | High per person 8.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Emery | Utah | $7.8M | High per person Big increase 6.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. Up 242% since FY2024. |
| Deer Lodge | Montana | $7.8M | High per person 6.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| San Saba | Texas | $7.7M | High per person 8.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Giles | Tennessee | $7.7M | Big increase Up 361% since FY2024. |
| Shannon | Missouri | $7.7M | High per person 6.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Santa Rosa | Florida | $7.7M | Big drop Down 55% since FY2024. |
| Tehama | California | $7.7M | Big drop Down 68% since FY2024. |
| Stutsman | North Dakota | $7.5M | Big increase Up 105% since FY2024. |
| Box Butte | Nebraska | $7.5M | High per person Big increase 5.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. Up 212% since FY2024. |
| Mitchell | Texas | $7.5M | Big increase Up 1,059% since FY2024. |
| Meeker | Minnesota | $7.4M | Big increase Up 528% since FY2024. |
| Henry | Tennessee | $7.4M | Big increase Up 333% since FY2024. |
| Moore | Texas | $7.4M | Big increase Up 117% since FY2024. |
| Drew | Arkansas | $7.4M | Big increase Up 313% since FY2024. |
| Johnson | Georgia | $7.4M | High per person 6.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Lee | North Carolina | $7.4M | Big drop Down 82% since FY2024. |
| Seward | Kansas | $7.3M | Big increase Up 469% since FY2024. |
| Yamhill | Oregon | $7.3M | Big drop Down 57% since FY2024. |
| Mitchell | Kansas | $7.2M | High per person Big increase 7.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. Up 565% since FY2024. |
| Steele | Minnesota | $7.2M | Big increase Up 808% since FY2024. |
| Hidalgo | New Mexico | $7.2M | High per person Big increase 11.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. Up 125% since FY2024. |
| Corson | South Dakota | $7.2M | High per person 12.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Jackson | Kansas | $7.1M | Big drop Down 77% since FY2024. |
| Ulster | New York | $7.1M | Big drop Down 79% since FY2024. |
| Tillman | Oklahoma | $7.1M | High per person 6.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Lynn | Texas | $7.1M | High per person 7.6× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Washakie | Wyoming | $7.1M | High per person 5.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Kanabec | Minnesota | $7.0M | Big increase Up 120% since FY2024. |
| Rio Blanco | Colorado | $6.9M | High per person Big increase 6.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. Up 112% since FY2024. |
| Southeast Fairbanks | Alaska | $6.9M | High per person Big drop 6.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. Down 75% since FY2024. |
| Cook | Minnesota | $6.9M | High per person 7.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Reynolds | Missouri | $6.9M | High per person 6.8× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Cumberland | Illinois | $6.9M | High per person 5.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Park | Colorado | $6.8M | Big increase Up 132% since FY2024. |
| Wyoming | New York | $6.8M | Big increase Up 225% since FY2024. |
| Bryan | Georgia | $6.8M | Big increase Up 174% since FY2024. |
| Kent | Maryland | $6.8M | Big increase Up 224% since FY2024. |
| Stafford | Kansas | $6.8M | High per person Big increase 10.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. Up 781% since FY2024. |
| Madison | Louisiana | $6.8M | High per person 5.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Grant | Louisiana | $6.8M | Big increase Up 138% since FY2024. |
| Norton | Virginia | $6.7M | High per person 11.8× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. |
| St. Tammany | Louisiana | $6.6M | Big drop Down 60% since FY2024. |
| Independence | Arkansas | $6.6M | Big drop Down 73% since FY2024. |
| Camden | Missouri | $6.6M | Big increase Up 288% since FY2024. |
| Carbon | Montana | $6.6M | Big increase Up 378% since FY2024. |
| Scott | Tennessee | $6.5M | Big increase Up 155% since FY2024. |
| Crawford | Arkansas | $6.5M | Big drop Down 52% since FY2024. |
| Gage | Nebraska | $6.4M | Big drop Down 61% since FY2024. |
| Broomfield | Colorado | $6.4M | Big drop Down 60% since FY2024. |
| Decatur | Georgia | $6.4M | Big increase Up 140% since FY2024. |
| Buffalo | South Dakota | $6.4M | High per person 21.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Randolph | Illinois | $6.3M | Big drop Down 51% since FY2024. |
| Rock | Minnesota | $6.2M | High per person 5.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $126), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Finney | Kansas | $6.2M | Big drop Down 79% since FY2024. |
| Malheur | Oregon | $6.1M | Big drop Down 56% since FY2024. |
| Big Horn | Wyoming | $6.1M | Big increase Up 296% since FY2024. |
| Wrangell | Alaska | $6.1M | High per person 18.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Dallas | Iowa | $6.1M | Big increase Up 324% since FY2024. |
| Shenandoah | Virginia | $6.1M | Big increase Up 252% since FY2024. |
| Alger | Michigan | $6.0M | Big increase Up 370% since FY2024. |
| Cameron | Pennsylvania | $6.0M | High per person 8.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Duchesne | Utah | $6.0M | Big increase New money: almost none in FY2024. |
| Sanilac | Michigan | $6.0M | Big increase Up 124% since FY2024. |
| Valley | Montana | $6.0M | Big increase Up 172% since FY2024. |
| Tazewell | Illinois | $5.9M | Big drop Down 62% since FY2024. |
| Fillmore | Nebraska | $5.9M | High per person Big increase 6.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. New money: almost none in FY2024. |
| Franklin | Vermont | $5.9M | Big drop Down 70% since FY2024. |
| Burt | Nebraska | $5.8M | Big drop Down 91% since FY2024. |
| Aitkin | Minnesota | $5.8M | Big drop Down 95% since FY2024. |
| Haines | Alaska | $5.8M | High per person 18.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Henry | Alabama | $5.7M | Big increase Up 779% since FY2024. |
| Butte | Idaho | $5.7M | High per person Big increase 14.6× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. New money: almost none in FY2024. |
| Johnson | Tennessee | $5.7M | Big increase New money: almost none in FY2024. |
| Dunn | Wisconsin | $5.6M | Big drop Down 62% since FY2024. |
| Carroll | Illinois | $5.6M | Big increase Up 189% since FY2024. |
| Sullivan | Missouri | $5.6M | Big increase New money: almost none in FY2024. |
| Niobrara | Wyoming | $5.6M | High per person Big increase 14.9× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. New money: almost none in FY2024. |
| Summit | Utah | $5.6M | Big increase Up 281% since FY2024. |
| Coryell | Texas | $5.5M | Big drop Down 79% since FY2024. |
| Kleberg | Texas | $5.5M | Big drop Down 64% since FY2024. |
| Custer | Idaho | $5.5M | High per person 8.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Wayne | Utah | $5.5M | High per person 14.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Washington | Idaho | $5.5M | Big increase New money: almost none in FY2024. |
| Grayson | Virginia | $5.5M | Big increase New money: almost none in FY2024. |
| Lyon | Minnesota | $5.5M | Big increase Up 133% since FY2024. |
| Lyon | Kansas | $5.4M | Big drop Down 67% since FY2024. |
| Harlan | Nebraska | $5.4M | High per person Big increase 11.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. New money: almost none in FY2024. |
| Clay | Iowa | $5.4M | Big increase Up 152% since FY2024. |
| Polk | North Carolina | $5.4M | Big increase Up 192% since FY2024. |
| Goochland | Virginia | $5.3M | Big increase Up 140% since FY2024. |
| Calhoun | West Virginia | $5.3M | High per person 5.1× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Branch | Michigan | $5.3M | Big increase Up 647% since FY2024. |
| Harrison | Iowa | $5.3M | Big increase Up 164% since FY2024. |
| Holt | Nebraska | $5.2M | Big increase Up 140% since FY2024. |
| Hopewell | Virginia | $5.2M | Big drop Down 51% since FY2024. |
| Suwannee | Florida | $5.2M | Big increase Up 148% since FY2024. |
| Adams | Idaho | $5.2M | High per person Big increase 7.7× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. Up 221% since FY2024. |
| Wise | Texas | $5.1M | Big increase Up 110% since FY2024. |
| Foard | Texas | $5.1M | High per person 30.6× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $153), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Alfalfa | Oklahoma | $5.1M | High per person 5.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $168), not counting state agencies based here. |
| Dale | Alabama | $5.0M | Big drop Down 64% since FY2024. |
| Grant | Oregon | $5.0M | Big drop Down 65% since FY2024. |
| Breathitt | Kentucky | $4.9M | Big drop Down 93% since FY2024. |
| Latimer | Oklahoma | $4.8M | Big drop Down 55% since FY2024. |
| Martin | Florida | $4.7M | Big drop Down 64% since FY2024. |
| Pickens | Alabama | $4.5M | Big drop Down 55% since FY2024. |
| Polk | Texas | $4.4M | Big drop Down 59% since FY2024. |
| Greenup | Kentucky | $4.3M | Big drop Down 77% since FY2024. |
| Franklin | Tennessee | $4.3M | Big drop Down 79% since FY2024. |
| Carteret | North Carolina | $4.2M | Big drop Down 67% since FY2024. |
| Pennington | Minnesota | $4.1M | Big drop Down 58% since FY2024. |
| Kendall | Illinois | $4.0M | Big drop Down 53% since FY2024. |
| Atoka | Oklahoma | $3.9M | Big drop Down 69% since FY2024. |
| Sullivan | New Hampshire | $3.9M | Big drop Down 94% since FY2024. |
| Webster | West Virginia | $3.9M | Big drop Down 63% since FY2024. |
| Bennington | Vermont | $3.9M | Big drop Down 84% since FY2024. |
| Lincoln | Nebraska | $3.7M | Big drop Down 85% since FY2024. |
| Menominee | Michigan | $3.6M | Big drop Down 90% since FY2024. |
| Tipton | Tennessee | $3.6M | Big drop Down 66% since FY2024. |
| Arenac | Michigan | $3.6M | Big drop Down 75% since FY2024. |
| Surry | North Carolina | $3.6M | Big drop Down 76% since FY2024. |
| Lincoln | North Carolina | $3.5M | Big drop Down 60% since FY2024. |
| St. Francis | Arkansas | $3.5M | Big drop Down 54% since FY2024. |
| Todd | Minnesota | $3.5M | Big drop Down 71% since FY2024. |
| Franklin | North Carolina | $3.4M | Big drop Down 64% since FY2024. |
| Caldwell | North Carolina | $3.4M | Big drop Down 52% since FY2024. |
| Sussex | New Jersey | $3.4M | Big drop Down 62% since FY2024. |
| Harnett | North Carolina | $3.3M | Big drop Down 63% since FY2024. |
| Haywood | North Carolina | $3.3M | Big drop Down 73% since FY2024. |
| Hoke | North Carolina | $3.3M | Big drop Down 64% since FY2024. |
| Tate | Mississippi | $3.3M | Big drop Down 72% since FY2024. |
| Logan | West Virginia | $3.2M | Big drop Down 51% since FY2024. |
| Rockingham | North Carolina | $3.2M | Big drop Down 57% since FY2024. |
| Webster | Louisiana | $3.0M | Big drop Down 70% since FY2024. |
| Barbour | Alabama | $3.0M | Big drop Down 71% since FY2024. |
| Manitowoc | Wisconsin | $2.9M | Big drop Down 71% since FY2024. |
| Maury | Tennessee | $2.9M | Big drop Down 64% since FY2024. |
| Harford | Maryland | $2.9M | Big drop Down 58% since FY2024. |
| Pacific | Washington | $2.9M | Big drop Down 76% since FY2024. |
| Pike | Mississippi | $2.8M | Big drop Down 71% since FY2024. |
| Los Alamos | New Mexico | $2.7M | Big drop Down 75% since FY2024. |
| Jackson | Arkansas | $2.7M | Big drop Down 71% since FY2024. |
| Lyon | Nevada | $2.7M | Big drop Down 52% since FY2024. |
| Transylvania | North Carolina | $2.6M | Big drop Down 77% since FY2024. |
| Davidson | North Carolina | $2.6M | Big drop Down 75% since FY2024. |
| Mellette | South Dakota | $2.6M | Big drop Down 85% since FY2024. |
| New Kent | Virginia | $2.5M | Big drop Down 51% since FY2024. |
| McPherson | Kansas | $2.5M | Big drop Down 65% since FY2024. |
| Perry | Alabama | $2.5M | Big drop Down 84% since FY2024. |
| Putnam | New York | $2.5M | Big drop Down 84% since FY2024. |
| Piscataquis | Maine | $2.5M | Big drop Down 81% since FY2024. |
| Estill | Kentucky | $2.4M | Big drop Down 66% since FY2024. |
| Tucker | West Virginia | $2.4M | Big drop Down 73% since FY2024. |
| Beaverhead | Montana | $2.4M | Big drop Down 56% since FY2024. |
| Taylor | West Virginia | $2.4M | Big drop Down 79% since FY2024. |
| Jackson | Minnesota | $2.4M | Big drop Down 73% since FY2024. |
| Izard | Arkansas | $2.4M | Big drop Down 53% since FY2024. |
| Milam | Texas | $2.3M | Big drop Down 68% since FY2024. |
| Laurens | Georgia | $2.3M | Big drop Down 83% since FY2024. |
| Nassau | Florida | $2.3M | Big drop Down 62% since FY2024. |
| White | Georgia | $2.3M | Big drop Down 89% since FY2024. |
| Lyon | Iowa | $2.3M | Big drop Down 55% since FY2024. |
| Okfuskee | Oklahoma | $2.3M | Big drop Down 73% since FY2024. |
| Pottawatomie | Kansas | $2.2M | Big drop Down 88% since FY2024. |
| Sumner | Kansas | $2.2M | Big drop Down 57% since FY2024. |
| Woods | Oklahoma | $2.2M | Big drop Down 63% since FY2024. |
| Eastland | Texas | $2.1M | Big drop Down 72% since FY2024. |
| Randolph | Georgia | $2.1M | Big drop Down 79% since FY2024. |
| Idaho | Idaho | $2.0M | Big drop Down 70% since FY2024. |
| Franklin | Missouri | $2.0M | Big drop Down 72% since FY2024. |
| Caldwell | Louisiana | $2.0M | Big drop Down 64% since FY2024. |
| Clinton | Iowa | $2.0M | Big drop Down 83% since FY2024. |
| Grundy | Illinois | $2.0M | Big drop Down 65% since FY2024. |
| St. Joseph | Michigan | $2.0M | Big drop Down 81% since FY2024. |
| Lemhi | Idaho | $2.0M | Big drop Down 62% since FY2024. |
| Baxter | Arkansas | $1.9M | Big drop Down 77% since FY2024. |
| Montgomery | Kansas | $1.9M | Big drop Down 70% since FY2024. |
| Davison | South Dakota | $1.8M | Big drop Down 63% since FY2024. |
| Winnebago | Iowa | $1.8M | Big drop Down 87% since FY2024. |
| Colfax | Nebraska | $1.8M | Big drop Down 74% since FY2024. |
| Braxton | West Virginia | $1.8M | Big drop Down 78% since FY2024. |
| Washington | Florida | $1.7M | Big drop Down 70% since FY2024. |
| Christian | Kentucky | $1.7M | Big drop Down 72% since FY2024. |
| Upson | Georgia | $1.7M | Big drop Down 92% since FY2024. |
| Jackson | Ohio | $1.7M | Big drop Down 69% since FY2024. |
| Pocahontas | West Virginia | $1.6M | Big drop Down 82% since FY2024. |
| Crawford | Missouri | $1.6M | Big drop Down 89% since FY2024. |
| Robertson | Texas | $1.6M | Big drop Down 71% since FY2024. |
| Lander | Nevada | $1.6M | Big drop Down 70% since FY2024. |
| Sunflower | Mississippi | $1.6M | Big drop Down 76% since FY2024. |
| Yellow Medicine | Minnesota | $1.5M | Big drop Down 82% since FY2024. |
| Wexford | Michigan | $1.5M | Big drop Down 100% since FY2024. |
| Franklin | Arkansas | $1.5M | Big drop Down 92% since FY2024. |
| Skagway | Alaska | $1.4M | Big drop Down 88% since FY2024. |
| Jasper | Texas | $1.4M | Big drop Down 82% since FY2024. |
| Crook | Wyoming | $1.4M | Big drop Down 74% since FY2024. |
| Clinton | Illinois | $1.4M | Big drop Down 76% since FY2024. |
| Lake | Oregon | $1.4M | Big drop Down 81% since FY2024. |
| Arkansas | Arkansas | $1.3M | Big drop Down 75% since FY2024. |
| Van Wert | Ohio | $1.3M | Big drop Down 74% since FY2024. |
| Richland | Wisconsin | $1.3M | Big drop Down 86% since FY2024. |
| Schuyler | New York | $1.3M | Big drop Down 84% since FY2024. |
| Manassas | Virginia | $1.2M | Big drop Down 77% since FY2024. |
| Lake | Colorado | $1.2M | Big drop Down 78% since FY2024. |
| Boone | West Virginia | $1.2M | Big drop Down 86% since FY2024. |
| Carroll | Ohio | $1.1M | Big drop Down 78% since FY2024. |
| Warren | Tennessee | $1.1M | Big drop Down 79% since FY2024. |
| Coal | Oklahoma | $1.1M | Big drop Down 82% since FY2024. |
| Simpson | Mississippi | $1.0M | Big drop Down 90% since FY2024. |
| Moffat | Colorado | $1.0M | Big drop Down 86% since FY2024. |
| Chouteau | Montana | $937K | Big drop Down 82% since FY2024. |
| Jackson | Iowa | $929K | Big drop Down 83% since FY2024. |
| Pine | Minnesota | $901K | Big drop Down 87% since FY2024. |
| Marion | Arkansas | $895K | Big drop Down 83% since FY2024. |
| Montgomery | North Carolina | $849K | Big drop Down 95% since FY2024. |
| Miami | Kansas | $847K | Big drop Down 95% since FY2024. |
| Juneau | Wisconsin | $837K | Big drop Down 86% since FY2024. |
| Noxubee | Mississippi | $815K | Big drop Down 89% since FY2024. |
| Renville | Minnesota | $812K | Big drop Down 85% since FY2024. |
| Power | Idaho | $807K | Big drop Down 91% since FY2024. |
| Ashley | Arkansas | $805K | Big drop Down 91% since FY2024. |
| Champaign | Ohio | $790K | Big drop Down 94% since FY2024. |
| Saline | Arkansas | $774K | Big drop Down 86% since FY2024. |
| Williams | Ohio | $753K | Big drop Down 93% since FY2024. |
| Warren | North Carolina | $701K | Big drop Down 89% since FY2024. |
| Wasatch | Utah | $700K | Big drop Down 90% since FY2024. |
| Fleming | Kentucky | $682K | Big drop Down 92% since FY2024. |
| Crawford | Wisconsin | $631K | Big drop Down 90% since FY2024. |
| Kit Carson | Colorado | $610K | Big drop Down 92% since FY2024. |
| Brooke | West Virginia | $609K | Big drop Down 96% since FY2024. |
| Cassia | Idaho | $567K | Big drop Down 92% since FY2024. |
| Bullitt | Kentucky | $401K | Big drop Down 94% since FY2024. |
| Burnet | Texas | $385K | Big drop Down 94% since FY2024. |
| Montgomery | Mississippi | $385K | Big drop Down 96% since FY2024. |
| Bollinger | Missouri | $366K | Big drop Down 97% since FY2024. |
| Kiowa | Colorado | $328K | Big drop Down 95% since FY2024. |
| Haakon | South Dakota | $291K | Big drop Down 95% since FY2024. |
| Cheyenne | Nebraska | $265K | Big drop Down 96% since FY2024. |
| Teton | Idaho | $249K | Big drop Down 98% since FY2024. |
| Wilkinson | Georgia | $219K | Big drop Down 97% since FY2024. |
| Seward | Nebraska | $215K | Big drop Down 97% since FY2024. |
| Foster | North Dakota | $215K | Big drop Down 98% since FY2024. |
| Teton | Montana | $200K | Big drop Down 96% since FY2024. |
| Warren | Mississippi | $199K | Big drop Down 99% since FY2024. |
| DeKalb | Indiana | $195K | Big drop Down 97% since FY2024. |
| Graham | Kansas | $165K | Big drop Down 98% since FY2024. |
| Piute | Utah | $125K | Big drop Down 99% since FY2024. |
| Nottoway | Virginia | $105K | Big drop Down 100% since FY2024. |
| Richmond | Virginia | $93K | Big drop Down 98% since FY2024. |
| Stanton | Kansas | $34K | Big drop Down 99% since FY2024. |
| St. Helena | Louisiana | $7K | Big drop Down 100% since FY2024. |
| Tolland | Connecticut | $0 | Big drop Down 100% since FY2024. |
| Summers | West Virginia | −$43K | Big drop Down 101% since FY2024. |
| Koochiching | Minnesota | −$608K | Big drop Down 112% since FY2024. |
| Maverick | Texas | −$4.0M | Big drop Down 116% since FY2024. |
| Alexandria | Virginia | −$44.4M | Big drop Down 113% since FY2024. |
| Albany | New York | $92.6B | High per person 6.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $290), not counting state agencies based here. This county is the seat of state government, so other state offices likely explain much of it. |
| Sangamon | Illinois | $32.1B | High per person 11.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $196), not counting state agencies based here. This county is the seat of state government, so other state offices likely explain much of it. |
| Ingham | Michigan | $29.5B | High per person 5.6× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $290), not counting state agencies based here. This county is the seat of state government, so other state offices likely explain much of it. |
| Suffolk | Massachusetts | $25.1B | High per person 15.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $290), not counting state agencies based here. This county is the seat of state government, so other state offices likely explain much of it. |
| District of Columbia | District of Columbia | $24.3B | High per person 120.3× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $290), not counting state agencies based here. This county is the seat of state government, so other state offices likely explain much of it. |
| Richmond | Virginia | $23.5B | High per person 7.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $196), not counting state agencies based here. This county is the seat of state government, so other state offices likely explain much of it. |
| Franklin | Kentucky | $20.9B | High per person 5.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $123), not counting state agencies based here. This county is the seat of state government, so other state offices likely explain much of it. |
| Baltimore | Maryland | $19.5B | High per person 18.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $290), not counting state agencies based here. This county is the seat of state government, so other state offices likely explain much of it. |
| Davidson | Tennessee | $18.9B | High per person 5.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $290), not counting state agencies based here. This county is the seat of state government, so other state offices likely explain much of it. |
| Thurston | Washington | $18.4B | High per person 16.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $290), not counting state agencies based here. This county is the seat of state government, so other state offices likely explain much of it. |
| Cole | Missouri | $17.0B | High per person 8.4× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $152), not counting state agencies based here. This county is the seat of state government, so other state offices likely explain much of it. |
| Dane | Wisconsin | $14.8B | High per person 5.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $290), not counting state agencies based here. This county is the seat of state government, so other state offices likely explain much of it. |
| Hinds | Mississippi | $9.5B | High per person 5.8× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $196), not counting state agencies based here. This county is the seat of state government, so other state offices likely explain much of it. |
| Juneau | Alaska | $5.7B | High per person 34.2× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $149), not counting state agencies based here. This county is the seat of state government, so other state offices likely explain much of it. |
| Burleigh | North Dakota | $3.1B | High per person 44.5× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $152), not counting state agencies based here. This county is the seat of state government, so other state offices likely explain much of it. |
| Washington | Vermont | $3.0B | High per person 12.0× the grants per person of similar-sized counties (typical: $152), not counting state agencies based here. This county is the seat of state government, so other state offices likely explain much of it. |